Safety & quality
SKKB integrates safety and quality into both design decisions and site supervision. Risk is highest where temperature-controlled storage, hazardous processes, ammonia refrigeration, heavy plant, or live logistics interfaces are in scope — those commissions receive proportionately stricter planning, documentation, and inspection regimes.
The items below summarise how we typically govern sites when we hold a supervision or delivery role. Your project-specific safety plan, method statements, and hold-point register remain contractual documents — align public statements here with your certified management system (for example ISO 45001 / 9001) where you maintain certification.
- Mandatory site inductions, PPE rules, emergency contacts, and permit-to-work discipline before trades mobilise.
- Documented inspections, toolbox talks, and risk-based hold points aligned to the programme — with bi-weekly or agreed reporting rhythms on supervised projects.
- Subcontractor pre-qualification against scope, geography, prior performance, and safety statistics; clear interfaces for MEP and specialist vendors.
- Structured checks for critical structure, geotechnical and temporary works, weathering, waterproofing, refrigeration plant, fire and life-safety systems, and commissioning readiness.
- Non-conformance and corrective-action registers — closures signed before concealment or energisation of concealed services.
- Refrigeration, hazardous materials, and hot-work controls: dedicated procedures, competent persons, and coordination with client operations so emergency scenarios are rehearsed, not improvised.
- Alignment with Jordanian labour, workplace-safety, and civil-defence reporting duties on supervised sites — coordinated with the main contractor’s health-and-safety plan and the agreed emergency hierarchy.
Published certifications, audit summaries, TRIR/LTIF-style statistics, and named safety leadership can be added here when your board and insurers approve public disclosure.